Skip to content

Conversation

@camsteffen
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 28, 2025

Some changes occurred in match lowering

cc @Nadrieril

Some changes occurred in src/tools/clippy

cc @rust-lang/clippy

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-clippy Relevant to the Clippy team. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Oct 28, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 28, 2025

r? @wesleywiser

rustbot has assigned @wesleywiser.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 28, 2025

Changes to the size of AST and/or HIR nodes.

cc @nnethercote

@wesleywiser
Copy link
Member

Nice find!

@bors r+ rollup=never

AST type sizes are often perf sensitive

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 28, 2025

📌 Commit a45c6dd has been approved by wesleywiser

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 28, 2025
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 29, 2025

⌛ Testing commit a45c6dd with merge 907705a...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 29, 2025

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: wesleywiser
Pushing 907705a to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Oct 29, 2025
@bors bors merged commit 907705a into rust-lang:master Oct 29, 2025
12 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.93.0 milestone Oct 29, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

What is this? This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing 044d68c (parent) -> 907705a (this PR)

Test differences

Show 6 test diffs

6 doctest diffs were found. These are ignored, as they are noisy.

Test dashboard

Run

cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
    test-dashboard 907705abea355952d84ed39cea256ed4570bdda6 --output-dir test-dashboard

And then open test-dashboard/index.html in your browser to see an overview of all executed tests.

Job duration changes

  1. dist-aarch64-msvc: 5783.6s -> 7432.6s (28.5%)
  2. dist-aarch64-apple: 6393.5s -> 7966.2s (24.6%)
  3. dist-apple-various: 2986.2s -> 3461.8s (15.9%)
  4. x86_64-msvc-2: 6482.2s -> 7127.4s (10.0%)
  5. dist-i586-gnu-i586-i686-musl: 5369.8s -> 4846.0s (-9.8%)
  6. x86_64-gnu-tools: 3681.7s -> 3330.3s (-9.5%)
  7. dist-ohos-armv7: 4103.3s -> 4492.3s (9.5%)
  8. pr-check-2: 2545.7s -> 2315.7s (-9.0%)
  9. aarch64-gnu: 7079.1s -> 6489.9s (-8.3%)
  10. aarch64-msvc-2: 5614.1s -> 5166.1s (-8.0%)
How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (907705a): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.5% [1.5%, 1.5%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 0.9%, secondary 0.4%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.2% [2.2%, 2.2%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
4.5% [4.5%, 4.5%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.5% [-0.5%, -0.5%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-1.7% [-1.7%, -1.6%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.9% [-0.5%, 2.2%] 2

Cycles

Results (secondary 2.3%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
4.7% [2.6%, 6.6%] 3
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-4.8% [-4.8%, -4.8%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 474.307s -> 474.692s (0.08%)
Artifact size: 390.07 MiB -> 390.07 MiB (0.00%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-clippy Relevant to the Clippy team. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants